I scanned through the magazine, read some parts more than others. I would be careful on the correlations regarding war, especially in a specific way. Today war is waged for profit, not out of survival or necessity. As long as there is money to be made on weapons and ammunition and especially the debt created by destruction for the 'build backs' (The banks interest gain), WAR for profit will not end. Now, does RE make for a more stable energy environment? Yes. Is it a better way to go? Yes. DO we need it for species survival? Yes. Does it make for a healthier planet for all of Earths inhabitant's? Yes.
But again you had a line, "......it can improve the resiliency and security of standing militaries......" Standing militaries are the quint essential TOOLS of CW used to facilitate war. No standing militaries, no war, at least as we define it today. Russia's invasion was a pure unattracted act of aggression, unprovoked for the benefit of those in power and profit. It was not "need" based for any of the masses in either country (Famine, energy starvation, water, etc.). And as long as those incentives exist, the world could be 100% RE and war will still exist with all its
nihilistic and fascistic over tones.
------------------------------
william fitch
Owner
www.WeAreSolar.comfcfcfc@ptd.net------------------------------